Business Central Fit & Architecture Assessment
17 questions about your legal, financial and process structure. The result appears immediately and without contact details: the read per topic area and the architecture decisions your structure forces. It is explicitly not a buying recommendation — and there is no score.
Which decisions does your structure force before you can choose?
Chart of accounts, dimensions, intercompany and consolidation path are decided before the platform, not after it. The assessment exists to put those on one page while they are still cheap to change.
Why we do not output a fit percentage.
A percentage about the fit of an ERP is either trivial or misleading. What is useful is the question of which decisions your structure forces — and whether the standard carries them, whether configuration solves them, or whether a deliberate architecture decision becomes necessary.
- 01
Six topic groups
Legal structure, finance and reporting, business model, operations, system landscape and organisation.
- 02
Six reads per topic area
The standard carries · configuration decides · architecture needed · integration likely · consider a complement · validation needed.
- 03
Five possible overall reads
From a strong native fit through to a possible product mismatch — that last state is deliberately provided for.
- 04
An honest referral
If your structure argues against Business Central, we say so and show where the alternative sits in the group.
Prefer to talk directly?
The assessment is the usual entry point, but not a mandatory station. If you already know what you need, we go straight to the target model, the migration route or support.